Back
to site
Glossary Print

TAKING BETTER ACCOUNT OF SOCIAL INEQUALITIES IN HEALTH:
THE RÉFLEX-ISS TOOL

User Manual

To begin, we suggest you identify at what your stage your project is; then, for each discussion element of that stage, identify which of the five possible choices, from 0 to 5, best represents the level of progress in discussing and addressing that element. Here is a description of the five levels within which to situate your project’s progress with regard to taking SIH into account :

(0) « Not considered » : means that the element has not been considered in the intervention, or that the team is not able to express its position with respect to this question. Discussion should be initiated!

(1) « Discussion initiated » : means that the element has been discussed briefly and the thought process is still in an early stage. There is more work to be done!

(2) « Concrete actions proposed » : indicates that the element has been discussed at length within the team, that concrete proposals are being reviewed, but that they now have to be carried out. All efforts must be concentrated on consolidating gains and working to achieve concrete measures!

(3) « Concrete actions undertaken » : means that several concrete actions have been undertaken, but they are not yet sufficient to fulfill your action’s full potential for reducing SIH. You are on the right path, only a bit more effort is needed!

(4) « Element accounted for » : means that the element has been significantly taken into account in the actions implemented. Now you need to sustain what has been achieved!

Finally, in the section on the right, we invite you to provide comments explaining the identified level of progress as well as notes on contextual elements and specific measures taken. Once your analysis is completed, there is a reserved section at the end of the stage where you can record your assessment and suggestions for possible improvement.

At the end of the grid, there is a final section where you can record the overall assessment of the project and note paths for improvements to be pursued or undertaken.

Important considerations:












PROJECT DEVELOPMENT STAGES

  1. PROJECT PLANNING
  2. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
  3. EMPOWERMENT
  4. EVALUATION
  5. SUSTAINABILITY
  6. GLOBAL REPORT
1. PROJECT PLANNING
elements to consider
and adress
Not
considered
Discussion
initiated
Concrete
actions
proposed
Concrete
actions
undertaken
Element
accompted
for
Not
applicable
Reasoning, measures
undertaken, and contextual
elements
01234
Q1.The nature of the problem of social inequalities in health* (SIH) and the problems experienced by the different target subgroups* of the population concerned by the project have been clearly described and defined in the project.
Q2.The context and the social determinants* likely to have an effect on identified SIH issues have been described.
Q3.Different determinants have been investigated for each of the target subgroups of the population concerned by the intervention (e.g., age, sex, cultural background, level of education).
Q4.The target subgroups have been identified using a description of the SIH problem that is based on different sources of information: - theoretical knowledge or explanatory models - scientific knowledge/surveillance data - advice from subject matter experts and/or professionals
Q5.The SIH problem description has taken into account the opinions of the different target subgroups of the population concerned by the intervention.
Q6.The actors involved in the intervention share a similar vision of the context and SIH issues for each of the target subgroups.
Q7.The focus of the project and its activities target the social determinants of health at the root of the SIH identified.
Q8.The intervention proposes an array of activities to address the different needs of the target subgroups of the concerned population, following the strategy of proportionate universalism*.
Q9.The project’s focus is specifically to reduce SIH.
Q10.The intervention objectives are consistent with the analysis of the SIH problem.
Q11.The methods and action strategies selected to reduce SIH are based on available best practices*.
Q12.Potential undesirable outcomes* for SIH have been anticipated.
Q13.The main intersectoral partners concerned by the intervention have been involved from the beginning, at the planning stage.
Q14.Field practitioners with specific experience in the area of fighting SIH have been involved from the beginning, at the planning stage.
Q15.Persons from the different target subgroups have been involved from the beginning, at the planning stage.
Q16.The various opinions, potentially opposing visions, and the power relationships between the different partners involved in the decision-making process surrounding SIH issues have been presented and discussed.

Overall evaluation

Examine all of the replies and comments you have provided for this stage. Now, assign yourself an overall grade for the stage with respect to measures undertaken to better take SIH into account. Simply choose between green, yellow or red. As the yellow category is a particularly large one, it may be useful to identify potential improvements within this category. This grade will give you an idea of your project’s SIH-gradient at this particular stage.




Stage assessment

Highest priority suggested improvement

According to the cultural and historical context of the target subgroups’ environments, organizational contexts, your human and financial resources, and the values shared or not shared by the project stakeholders.

Suggested improvement 1

Lead person

Timeframe

Suggested improvement 2

Lead person

Timeframe

2. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
elements to consider
and adress
Not
considered
Discussion
initiated
Concrete
actions
proposed
Concrete
actions
undertaken
Element
accompted
for
Not
applicable
Reasoning, measures
undertaken, and contextual
elements
01234
Q17.Measures have been deployed to encourage and equip intervention workers to reduce SIH.
Q18.The proposed action takes into account the cultural and historical context of the environments to which target subgroups belong.
Q19.Incentive measures* have been deployed to encourage the different target subgroups to participate in implementing the intervention.
Q20.Work methods have been adopted that enable the team to take into account target subgroups’ point of view and encourage their contribution.
Q21.The roles, tasks, and responsibilities specific to SIH reduction have been clearly identified for all actors involved in the intervention.
Q22.The lead person for the intervention as well as all team members have taken all possible steps to acquire sufficient knowledge so that they can confidently conduct activities intended to reduce SIH.
Q23.The lead person for the intervention, the intervention workers, and partners have considered how to monitor for any potential undesirable outcomes, which could contribute to increasing or perpetuating SIH.
Q24.Leadership in areas related to SIH is shared between the different intervention stakeholders.
Q25.The lead person for the intervention is aware of SIH and provides leadership to engage stakeholders in reducing SIH.
Q26.The intervention processes, particularly the communication tools, are adapted to the literacy* level of each target subgroup.
Q27.Mechanisms have been deployed to facilitate the participation of the target subgroups and to adapt to the following constraints: Physical accessibility, Geographic accessibility, Financial accessibility.
Q28.Potential sources of stigmatization* and discrimination have been taken into account.

Overall evaluation

Examine all of the replies and comments you have provided for this stage. Now, assign yourself an overall grade for the stage with respect to measures undertaken to better take SIH into account. Simply choose between green, yellow or red. As the yellow category is a particularly large one, it may be useful to identify potential improvements within this category. This grade will give you an idea of your project’s SIH-gradient at this particular stage.




Stage assessment

Highest priority suggested improvement

According to the cultural and historical context of the target subgroups’ environments, organizational contexts, your human and financial resources, and the values shared or not shared by the project stakeholders.

Suggested improvement 1

Lead person

Timeframe

Suggested improvement 2

Lead person

Timeframe

3. EMPOWERMENT
elements to consider
and adress
Not
considered
Discussion
initiated
Concrete
actions
proposed
Concrete
actions
undertaken
Element
accompted
for
Not
applicable
Reasoning, measures
undertaken, and contextual
elements
01234
Q29.The intervention aims to strengthen the empowerment* of target subgroups.
Q30.Activities have been undertaken to improve competencies, participation, self-esteem, and/or critical awareness among the target subgroups, thus enabling them to take action on what matters to them by participating in this project.

Overall evaluation

Examine all of the replies and comments you have provided for this stage. Now, assign yourself an overall grade for the stage with respect to measures undertaken to better take SIH into account. Simply choose between green, yellow or red. As the yellow category is a particularly large one, it may be useful to identify potential improvements within this category. This grade will give you an idea of your project’s SIH-gradient at this particular stage.




Stage assessment

Highest priority suggested improvement

According to the cultural and historical context of the target subgroups’ environments, organizational contexts, your human and financial resources, and the values shared or not shared by the project stakeholders.

Suggested improvement 1

Lead person

Timeframe

Suggested improvement 2

Lead person

Timeframe

4. EVALUATION
elements to consider
and adress
Not
considered
Discussion
initiated
Concrete
actions
proposed
Concrete
actions
undertaken
Element
accompted
for
Not
applicable
Reasoning, measures
undertaken, and contextual
elements
01234
Q31.The provisions for monitoring implementation of the intervention include specific monitoring of actions concerning SIH.
Q32.An evaluation plan targeting SIH-related actions in particular has been developed from the initial planning stage of the intervention.
Q33.The partners involved in the project have helped design and carry out the evaluation plan, which focuses on SIH reduction in particular.
Q34.Persons from the different target subgroups affected by the intervention have participated in designing and carrying out the evaluation plan, which focuses on SIH reduction in particular.
Q35.The data collection methods (e.g. tools, approach, questionnaires) are adapted to the different levels of literacy of the respondents surveyed for the evaluation.
Q36.The evaluation assesses the intervention’s capacity to reduce SIH.
Q37.The evaluation includes indicators for determining the intervention’s effects on the different target subgroups.
Q38.The evaluation looks at potential undesirable effects of the intervention that might generate, increase, or perpetuate SIH.
Q39.The recommendations issued following the evaluation include adjustments to be made to the project with respect to reducing SIH.
Q40.The recommendations issued following the evaluation involved the different partners, including persons in the target subgroups.
Q41.There is a procedure for monitoring long-term effects to see whether or not the benefits or results of the intervention that affect SIH are maintained.

Overall evaluation

Examine all of the replies and comments you have provided for this stage. Now, assign yourself an overall grade for the stage with respect to measures undertaken to better take SIH into account. Simply choose between green, yellow or red. As the yellow category is a particularly large one, it may be useful to identify potential improvements within this category. This grade will give you an idea of your project’s SIH-gradient at this particular stage.




Stage assessment

Highest priority suggested improvement

According to the cultural and historical context of the target subgroups’ environments, organizational contexts, your human and financial resources, and the values shared or not shared by the project stakeholders.

Suggested improvement 1

Lead person

Timeframe

Suggested improvement 2

Lead person

Timeframe

5. SUSTAINABILITY
elements to consider
and adress
Not
considered
Discussion
initiated
Concrete
actions
proposed
Concrete
actions
undertaken
Element
accompted
for
Not
applicable
Reasoning, measures
undertaken, and contextual
elements
01234
Q42.Actions favouring sustainability of activities and of their effects on reducing SIH have been planned since the project planning stage.
Q43.Steps have been planned or taken to stabilize organizational resources dedicated to intervention activities targeting SIH reduction.
Q44.The functioning of the organization leading the intervention has been adjusted to enable it to take SIH into account more easily.

Overall evaluation

Examine all of the replies and comments you have provided for this stage. Now, assign yourself an overall grade for the stage with respect to measures undertaken to better take SIH into account. Simply choose between green, yellow or red. As the yellow category is a particularly large one, it may be useful to identify potential improvements within this category. This grade will give you an idea of your project’s SIH-gradient at this particular stage.




Stage assessment

Highest priority suggested improvement

According to the cultural and historical context of the target subgroups’ environments, organizational contexts, your human and financial resources, and the values shared or not shared by the project stakeholders.

Suggested improvement 1

Lead person

Timeframe

Suggested improvement 2

Lead person

Timeframe

Overall team assessment with respect to SIH

Remarks

Suggested improvements

Projet planning

Project implementation

Empowerment

Evaluation