Extension publications and misconceptions
Access to healthcare for vulnerable groups in West Africa
Knowledge transfer - Extension publications and misconceptions
Knowledge transfer
Project desription
Multimedia
All sheets (french only) :
Financing and access to health care in West Africa: empirical data, cartoons and received ideas.
Made by the designer Glez, this series of cartoon focuses on preconceived ideas that people can have about the implementation of free health care and health insurance coverage in Sub-Saharan Africa.
You will find under the flipbook a gallery of the caricatural pictures which the flipbook is made of and on the left of the page a complete brochure introducing a series of nine sheets aiming to show with evidences, how certain ideas about the principle of free care we regularly hear in the context of our knowledge transfer activities are lazy thoughts.
Health is priceless
The principle of “free care”—or, pardon, “exemption from user fees” (yes, semantics are important, as “free” is a taboo word!)— doesn’t seem to bother anyone but those who have the means to pay for their own access to healthcare services.
The consequences of user fees
User fees present a financial barrier to healthcare access for the poor and don’t really support healthcare systems financially. Yet even so, they are still very often advocated by some people.
Maternity without risk
Sometimes people say that it will never be possible to get “those women” to deliver in a health centre, usually because of cultural reasons. But why should we assume that some people would never go to a health centre, when it’s been shown that when financial and geographic barriers are removed, that’s no longer true for most people?
Health insurance and national solidarity
Recently in Burkina Faso, as in Mali, during the phase of sectoral and regional consultations on the strategic orientations of national health insurance, several key sectors of the Nation were opposed to the principle of national solidarity.
PBF and population health
Some experiments have already shown that quantity-based healthcare financing can have pernicious effects. If we put too much pressure on health workers by focusing on the quantity of illnesses, is there a risk of making people even sicker?
The myth of community-based health insurance (CBHI)
In 30 years of attempts in West Africa, the most successful community-based health insurance have never gotten above 5% coverage. Nevertheless, they continue to be a staple feature of any reflection on improving financial access to care for the worst-off.
Equity and the use of evidence
Even though it is never easy to formulate and implement public policies, there is a great deal of scientific evidence that could make them effective and equitable. Yet in the past 30 years decision-makers have most often forgotten about equity in their policies.
Vision and political will
In West Africa, children can access healthcare services because they are exempted from point-of-service user fees. This costs less than $5 US per child per year, and should be funded thanks to the political will of decision-makers.
Providing care to indigents
Exemption of user fees for indigent care has been included in health policies since user fees were introduced. But after 30 years, hundreds of workshops, committee meetings, studies and action research projects to develop criteria and processes for identifying them, the indigent continue to be excluded from the healthcare system. What’s really the problem?
PBF and motivation
Some experts explain that the success of performance-based financing (PBF) is guaranteed by the fact that it is based primarily on the “carrot-and-stick” principle. But isn’t health worker motivation a little more complex than that?
Planning and funding subsidy policies
Some healthcare subsidy programs offer partial coverage and have “holes” in the package of services provided. Often they’re complex, making them difficult to understand, for the population and sometimes even for health workers. As such, they go against the principle of continuity of care and become less effective.
Vertical organization and bureaucracy
Because of the vertical organization and bureaucracy of many health programs, health centre managers have to manage their team, their inputs, the infrastructure, financial resources, the epidemiological situation, and keep up with training, submit countless numbers of reports every month, etc., and, oh, by the way,…. look after patients.
Universal health coverage and public service
Public healthcare services are often criticized and stigmatized, but most often the care they provide is of better quality than care provided elsewhere and only public funding can guarantee equitable access.
Advocacy or proselytizing …?
The constant proselytizing from most technical and financial partners (including certain researchers…) trying to sell their “agenda” to governments has turned into pandemonium for the national decision-makers who set policy.
